mambo

Alternative News


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 September
2008 August
2008 July
2008 June
2007 August
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April

My Links
Capitol Hill Blue
The Scotsman
ZNet
The Guardian
911 Soundbyte
Daily Heretic
Baghdad Burning
Counterpunch
Democratic Underground
Global Research
Serendipity
Signs of the Times

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Torture and abuse continue in Iraq
04.28.05 (5:31 pm)   [edit]




The Bush-man muttered and stumbled through the reporters question about torture tonight.  I don't wonder why.


AFP
April 28, 2005






AMNESTY International blasted the United States today for failing to launch an independent probe into Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison scandal, a year after images of abused detainees first shocked the world.


The London-based human rights organisation also condemned signs of fresh torture and sexual abuse in the country by the Iraqi prison authorities.


"People around the world will be recalling the horrific images they saw a year ago and wondering what happened to those prisoners," said Amnesty secretary general Irene Khan, noting that only a handful of low-ranking US soldiers had been prosecuted or disciplined over the outrage.


"But what was the role of those higher up, including, for example, the US secretary of defence?" she said, referring to Donald Rumsfeld.


A year after the dramatic revelations of sexual and physical abuse at the prison on Baghdad's western outskirts were leaked to the media, only five of seven US guards have been punished.


Full Article Here

0 Comments
 
genealogy
04.26.05 (3:41 pm)   [edit]

Have you ever wondered about your ancestors.  


I came across and interesting genealogy site by Laura Knight-Jadczyk.  Surprise!! you may be a blue blood.

0 Comments
 
FISCISM: Are we there yet
04.25.05 (7:02 pm)   [edit]

WERE ARE HERE


 


Margaret Kimberly
Prison Planet
April 23 2005
Our government is treating us the way exterminators treat vermin. We are ruled by people who mask evil ideology with the artful use of language, so an advertising slogan is in order.


"Roaches check in, but they don't check out."


The United States government is now proposing that the roach treatment be meted out to American humans who want to visit Canada, Mexico, Panama and Bermuda. These countries currently do not require visiting Americans to have passports.


The United States can't force these nations to change their laws, so they are changing ours. The Department of State is proposing that Americans returning from these countries be required to have passports in order to re- enter the United States. We'll be able to check in, but not check out without letting Uncle Sam know where we have been.


When the President was asked about the new travel proposals he feigned both ignorance and concern:


"When I first read that in the newspaper, about the need to have passports, for particularly the day crossings that take place – about a million, for example in the state of Texas – I said, 'What's going on here?'"


Bush added that finger prints may be used "to serve as a so-called passport for daily traffic." Assuming this statement has any bearing in reality, a big leap to be sure, the President is proposing that we should all be finger printed like criminals. Bush once joked that a dictatorship wouldn't bother him, as long as he was the dictator. His wish has come true.


Full Story Here



 

:twisted:
0 Comments
 
Bush's most radical plan yet
04.25.05 (10:43 am)   [edit]

King George is on the way to his throne.


With a vote of hand-picked lobbyists, the president could terminate any federal agency he dislikes
By OSHA GRAY DAVIDSON
Rolling Stone
If you've got something to hide in Washington, the best place to bury it is in the federal budget. The spending plan that President Bush submitted to Congress this year contains 2,000 pages that outline funding to safeguard the environment, protect workers from injury and death, crack down on securities fraud and ensure the safety of prescription drugs. But almost unnoticed in the budget, tucked away in a single paragraph, is a provision that could make every one of those protections a thing of the past.


The proposal, spelled out in three short sentences, would give the president the power to appoint an eight-member panel called the "Sunset Commission," which would systematically review federal programs every ten years and decide whether they should be eliminated. Any programs that are not "producing results," in the eyes of the commission, would "automatically terminate unless the Congress took action to continue them."


Full story Signs of The Times

2 Comments
 
Pope Benedict woos media
04.24.05 (10:42 am)   [edit]



By Peter Gould
BBC News, Vatican City




It was hardly an intimate gathering, but I got my audience with Pope Benedict.

The world's media have been swarming all over the Vatican since the death of John Paul II.


Over the past month, we have seen some extraordinary sights in and around St Peter's Square.


We witnessed the vigils for the dying pope, and marvelled at the millions who came to say farewell.


There was the solemn splendour of a papal funeral, and the excitement of the white smoke that greeted the election of his successor.


Today, Benedict XVI called us in, 4,000 of us, to thank us for our journalistic efforts.


Lucky tourists


The tension of the past weeks seemed to have evaporated. No more police cordons and arguments about passes and access. Even the usually stern Swiss Guards were smiling.


We were ushered into a vast audience hall used by popes to greet pilgrims. Even with so many journalists present, the hall was only half full.


The Vatican quietly allowed in groups of startled tourists, to fill up some of the vacant seats behind us.


They couldn't believe their luck. They were expecting a stroll around St Peter's Square in the sunshine. Instead they got to see the Pope.


"Fortuna, fortuna," said one couple from Sicily, in disbelief: "We were so lucky!"


It was a smart move by the Vatican. Pilgrims, being less cynical than hardened journalists, could be relied on to cheer and clap in the right places.


In fact, the papal minders need not have worried. The journalists were neatly attired for the occasion, with male correspondents wearing suits and ties.


And when the pope walked in, everyone stood and applauded, in many cases with real enthusiasm.


Having been shown due respect, Benedict XVI seemed prepared to forgive us for all those reports saying how many Catholics were alarmed by his election.


'Thanks for the coverage'


Sitting on a papal throne that looked too big for his small frame, the pope pulled out his gold-rimmed reading glasses and proceeded to address us in Italian, English, French and German.


"Thanks to all of you, these historically important events have had worldwide coverage," he said.


"I know how hard you have worked, far away from your homes and families, for long hours and in sometimes difficult conditions."


The international media made a mental note to pass on the Pope's words to their editors.


I noticed that the pontiff was wearing the red leather slippers that I had seen a few days earlier in the window of the papal tailors.


At the end of the audience, which lasted about 15 minutes, Benedict XVI rose to give us his blessing.


Then with a friendly wave and the words "Grazie, arrivederci!" he left the stage.


This was not, by any stretch of the imagination, a press conference. There was no opportunity for the media to ask any questions, polite or otherwise.


Some journalists were disappointed that the Pope's remarks contained nothing of substance to give us a clue about the direction his papacy will take.


Controlled papacy


The style was also a little different from the audience for the press given by John Paul II, back in 1978.


Then, in a media melee, the new pope shook hands with reporters, and responded to their shouted questions.


Today's proceedings were more dignified and everything was firmly under control. In fact, some people believe control may be the watchword for this papacy.


However, the way some British newspapers have reported the background of the Pope - including his enforced membership of the Hitler Youth - has irritated the media in Germany.


"It is so silly, but they do the same at every football match," said one German TV journalist.


"They use the language of the war when we should be looking forward, not bringing up the past."


Following the media profiles, the new Pope has surprised many people with his engaging manner, which is rather at odds with his image as a hard-line conservative.


On Sunday, at his inaugural mass, he has the opportunity to win more hearts and minds.


comment from Signs Of The Times





Comment: Sounds like the Pope, as with any modern politician, but especially his friend George Bush, knows how to organise a press meeting in such a way as to give good television while delivering nothing of substance.
0 Comments
 
david beckham, russia, 911
04.23.05 (6:04 pm)   [edit]
I was surfing around in Blogsville last night and came across a very good blog named Catalytic Converter with a lot of fascinating information.

It appears that it is common knowledge in some Russian circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and it seems that information was kept from the public. Elsewhere on this blog I have asked “what’s up with Putin?” Well, I may have a clue now.

It also seems that the government is planting black propaganda in the international media, and certain groups for their own reasons are doing all they can to debunk the
PENTAGON STRIKE FLASH. (if you haven't seen this yet, you ought to have a look at it)


I have pasted a portion of his post below, where he also discusses the peak oil issue, Ruppert and Mark Rabinowitz .


Regular readers know that I am opposed to the Peak Oil concept, particularly when it is used to downplay the obvious crimes of the Bush Regime. In a blatant and obvious attempt at sleight of hand trickery, Ruppert (and buddyRobinowitz) is telling us to not look at the man behind the curtain, instead focus on our impending economic collapse due to peak oil.While searching for information on the email I received, I turned up this very interesting tidbit:
David Beckham and Flight 77 in Paris
[...] The dinner itself was "normal" in every respect, and MOST of the conversation was also "normal." It only got strange when politics - including the subject of George Bush and 9-11 - was brought up.Our friends who circulate socially among various government officials brought out some photos to show of a recent private party. Among the attendees of said party - which I reiterate, was private and not an "official function," was the brother of Vladimir Putin! There was the usual grouping of various ministers, AND one of the most powerful men in the Financial World (and here I don't mean America, I mean the GLOBAL Financial world!)What was interesting about these photos was the obvious camaraderie of these individuals depicted in the photographs. There was Vlad's brother whooping it up with what were obviously close pals in France.Hmmmm...So, of course I asked about this. What came next was, in a sense, quite shocking. It seems that it is common knowledge in these circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft (seems to have been a drone type plane rather than a missle) that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and that, for various reasons this information has been withheld from the public.I was naturally startled to hear this even though I have long held the opinion that it was NOT a commercial jetliner that hit the Pentagon. I think the thing that startled me was the fact that, if Russia (and perhaps other countries with satellites?) had proof that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, why weren't they revealing this?It was explained to me that during part of the time George Bush was "incommunicado" on September 11, 2001, he was on the phone to Putin "negotiating." That was a polite way of saying "blackmailing." Apparently, Bush, by way of MOSSAD and/or the CIA had enough goods on Vlad to keep him silent.Now THAT explains why Putin has not responded publicly to the rather obnoxious criticisms of Russia made by Bush and Condi Rice.In any event, it was explained to me further that these satellite photos HAD been revealed to Thierry Meyssan who was asked by either French or Russian intell to write his book "Pentagate" to "leak" the info that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. His instructions were, apparently, that he had to "make the case" without recourse to official backing; he couldn't refer to the satellite photos.Well, suddenly, a LOT of things began to make sense. [...]A lot of pieces begin to fall into place if we begin to consider that the above has some validity (and I do). The above post from Perfect Infidel, goes on to discuss the author of the email sent to me, Mark Rabinowitz:
Another interesting event in this timeline was the creation of a website with the domain name oilempire.us. This site lists what it calls "Bogus 9-11 Websites" saying:
The three biggest stories used to alienate the public from 9/11 truth1. No Planes on 9/11 (Pentagon, North Tower WTC, "pod plane" at SouthTower, Pennsylvania)2. The Jews Did It (Israel had foreknowledge and possibly played a role,but that doesn't justify anti-semitism and Holocaust Denial)3. The Victims' Phone Calls Were Faked (a way to keep the 9/11 familiesand the skeptics from working together)why are there bogus 9/11 websites? a mix of malice and incompetence, but both make real evidence harder to findConsidering the very good case for the involvement of MOSSAD in 9-11, the very good case that the victims phone calls WERE faked, not to mention what I have discovered about satellite photos on 9-11, it sure does look like the Oil Empire Website is a "plant," so to say. So I did a whois lookup. Here's what I found: [...] [catalytic: I cut out the whois information]The site is claimed by a Mark Rabinowitz even if it was "prepared for use" as early as February of 2003. That, in itself, is rather suspicious. Seems that this was right about the time that the Meyssan book was making a splash.Robinowitz was posting on usenet as far back as 1994 in regards to an auto free DC. He's on a few dc.biking threads on usenet.Rabinowitz then did some reporting for the Institute of Global Communications based in MD.[See: http://www.igc.apc.org/]He then moved to Eugene, Oregon by the looks of things and is into permaculture. He appears to be coming from a "green" perspective. He got into the Y2K hysteria for a bit and now it appears he's onto the "Peak Oil deal" via Ruppert.Do a Ruppert- Robinowitz search on google and you'll see what I mean in regards to the Ruppert promotion.So it DOES look like Ruppert - who has been quoted as promoting the "no plane theory" but has now advised everybody to just "forget 9-11 and concentrate on Peak Oil" - has a strange bedfellow with Rabinowitz.Shades of COINTELPRO!The Pentagon Strike Video has been such a hit on the internet that even the
Washington Post sat up and took notice. Something had to be done.Now just imagine what you would do, if you committed the crime of the century and had infinite resources to cover it up along with willing lackeys to sally forth and do your bidding. I am reminded of an old AC/DC song.Playing along with the Bush Regime is much worse than anything the anti-hero of that song could imagine doing. 9/11 has been used to justify mass murder and genocide. For the Worldwide Attack Matrix to continue, it is imperative that the truth not come out.And they might have overplayed their hand with blowing a hole in the side of the Pentagon. Hubris will get you every time.I have not yet seen a reasonable explanation as to how a plane could plow into the side of Pentagon in the heaviest defended air space in the world - without destroying the lawn or the lamp posts. The Regime is counting on most of us to not question the official story. For the rest of us, they send out their agents to create a lot of confusion and misdirection.Even with the message that the Bush regime allowed it to happen, justification can be made in the minds of some that we should continue and escalate the "War on Terrorism". That psyop fantasy still handily delivers the idea of the enemy out there, ready to strike at any moment, so give up your freedoms as we march off to war.Who had the resources to pull of such an attack? Who has benefited from these wars? Certainly not the people of Iraq or Afghanistan, who had nothing to do with 9/11 anyway. As the US and Israel prepare to escalate the violence, we can expect more desperate attempts to have us look away from the truth.

Click
here for entire post
0 Comments